WOODRUFF v. WILLIAMS et al
Petitioner: METTA WOODRUFF
Respondent: R. SETH WILLIAMS, JOHN WETZEL and KATHLEEN KANE
Case Number: 2:2014cv01146
Filed: February 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: EDMUND V. LUDWIG
Presiding Judge: DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CE RTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MAKE THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 2/15/17. 2/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER THAT THE 2/29/16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS NOT APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED BACK TO THE HONORABLE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE, UNIETD STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR REVIEW OF PETITIONER'S HABEAS CLAIMS ON THE MERITS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 10/19/16. 10/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
March 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS PLACED IN SUSPENSE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF STATE PROCEEDINGS; PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS SHALL NOTIFY THE COURT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THE CO NCLUSION OF THE STATE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS SO THAT THE HABEAS PETITION MAY PROCEED IN THIS COURT; AND REPONDENTS SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT A STATUS REPORT ON THE PROGRESS OF THE PCRA LITIGATION ON A QUARTERLY BASIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 3/28/16. 3/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOODRUFF v. WILLIAMS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: METTA WOODRUFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. SETH WILLIAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOHN WETZEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KATHLEEN KANE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?