FOWLER v. MOONEY et al
ROBERT FOWLER |
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2014cv01768 |
March 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
THOMAS J. RUETER |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254 FILED BY PRO SE PETITIONER, ROBERT FOWLER, THE RECORD IN THIS CASE, THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET AND THE OBJECT IONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED. THE OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT ARE OVERRULED FOR THE REAS ONS SET FORTH BELOW. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE BECASUE REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD NOT DEBATE THIS COURT'S DECISION THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT STATE A VALID CLAIM OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OR THE PROPRIETY OF THIS COURT'S PROCEDURAL RULINGS WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONER'S CLAIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 11/9/15. 11/10/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.