ALSTON v. WENEROWICZ et al
| MALIK ALSTON |
| WENEROWICZ, GEORGE ONDREJKA, G. EDWARDS, JOHN DOE and ADDITIONAL UNKOWN, DEFENDANTS |
| 2:2014cv02691 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT WENEROWICZ'S MOTION TO DISMISS 18 AND DEFENDANT LENTZ'S MOTION TO DISMISS 22 , IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST WENEROWICZ AND LENTZ ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 3/7/16. 3/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFTS. MOORE, WENEROWICZ, ONDREJKA, EDWARDS, AND SHAYLOR (DOC. NO. 10) IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: PLFF'S IMPROPER GRIEVANCE PROCESSING CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLFF'S DELI BERATE INDIFFERENCE, RETALIATION, AND CONSPIRACY CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLFF'S RIGHT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFF. IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 4/16/15.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 3/26/15. 3/27/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO THE LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
