PATEL v. PATEL
Plaintiff: ALKESH PATEL
Defendant: PRATIK PATEL
Counter_claimant: PRATIK PATEL
Counter_defendant: ALKESH PATEL
Case Number: 2:2014cv02949
Filed: May 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: ROBERT F. KELLY
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER THAT THE RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND MOTION IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL (DOC. 56 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 5/25/2016. 5/25/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
April 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO FREEZE DEFENDANTS ASSETS (DOC. 63 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 4/29/2016. 4/29/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER THAT COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT OT THE CLAIMS OF ASSAULT AND BATTERY AND DEFAMATION. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO THE CLAIMS OF INTERNATIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, CONSPIRACY, FALSE LIGHT, ADN TRADE LIBEL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 11/4/2015. 11/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, PRATIK PATEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 37(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 7/17/15. 7/17/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PATEL v. PATEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALKESH PATEL
Represented By: JOSEPH VACCARO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRATIK PATEL
Represented By: ROBERT S. DAVIS
Represented By: JAMES E. LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: PRATIK PATEL
Represented By: JAMES E. LEE
Represented By: JAMES E. LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: ALKESH PATEL
Represented By: JOSEPH VACCARO
Represented By: JOSEPH VACCARO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?