SPINA v. REFRIGERATION, SERVICE AND ENGINEERING, INC. et al
| THOMAS SPINA |
| KENNETH C. PHILO, II, CYNTHIA A. FITZGERALD-HEPP, ROBERT E. HEPP, III and REFRIGERATION, SERVICE AND ENGINEERING, INC. |
| 2:2014cv04230 |
| July 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| ROBERT F. KELLY |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IS GRANTED AND COUNTS I AND II ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 12/22/14. 12/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF, THOMAS SPINA'S "MOTION TO ENFORCE BUSINESS RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 1508 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW" [#13] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 10/7/14. 10/7/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF, THOMAS SPINA'S "MOTION FOR JUDICIAL SUPERVISION OF DISSOLUTION, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER OR CUSTODIAN" [#6] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 9/17/14. 9/17/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
