PARKE BANK v. KAPLIN et al
| PARKE BANK |
| MARC B. KAPLIN and GEORGE J. SPAEDER |
| 2:2014cv05293 |
| September 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER THAT GEORGE SPAEDER HAS NO STANDING TO OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT EITHER ON HIS OWN BEHALF OR ON BEHALF OF RHOADS AVENUE NEWTOWN SQUARE, LP. SPAEDERS OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ARE DENIED. WITHIN FOURTEEN ( 14) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ECKERD CORPORATIONTHE OTHER PARTY OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTSHALL FILE A LETTER OF NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) PAGES INDICATING WHETHER IT HAS ANY REMAINING OBJECTIONS. WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF THE LETTER FROM ECKERD CORPORATION, THE SETTLING PARTIES (PARKE BANK, SHELBOURNE NSQ ASSOCIATES, MARC B. KAPLIN AS TRUSTEE FOR THE KAPLIN STEWART MELOFF REITER & STEIN 401K PLAN, AND MARK B. KAPLIN INDIVIDUALLY) SHALL FILE A LETTER OF NO M ORE THAN FIVE (5) PAGES RESPONDING TO ANY REMAINING OBJECTIONS BY ECKERD CORPORATION. FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED LETTERS, THE COURT WILL DETERMINE WHETHER A CONFERENCE CALL IS NECESSARY TO RESOLVE ANY REMAINING DISPUTES AMONG THE PARTIES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 8/1/18. 8/2/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
