DELANEY et al v. SANBORN et al
| DOUGLAS SEAN DELANEY and JAMES RODERICK BRADY |
| SEAN SANBORN, JAY SANBORN, POLARHYDE DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, FIELCO, LLC, FIELCO INDUSTRIES, INC. and TONY RING |
| 2:2014cv05439 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| PAUL S. DIAMOND |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 49 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART ANDN DEFENANTS MOTION TO DIMISS (DOC. 50 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THIS COURT LACK PERSONAL JURISDICTION VOER DEFENDANT JAY SANBORN AND HE IS DI SMISSED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS FIELCO LLC, FIELCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND TONY RING BASED UPON ALLEGED CONDUCT OF CO-DEFENDANTS SEAN SANBORN OR POLARHYDE DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION ARE DISMISSED. ANY CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT TONY RING FOR CONVER SION AND UNJUST ENRICHEMENT ARE DISMISS AS AGAINST HIM. ALL REMAINING CLAIMS ARE STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE FINAL BINDING ARBITRATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN THE COURT'S CIVIL SUSPENSE DOCKET. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/30/2015. 6/30/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
