PANNETTA v. MILFORD CHRYSLER SALES INC. et al
| ANN M. PANNETTA |
| MILFORD CHRYSLER SALES INC., FIRST NATIONAL BANK, IMPACT DIRECT, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2014cv05680 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FIRST NATIONAL BANK'S MOTION [#15] IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST FIRST NATIONAL BANK FOR VIOLATION OF THE TRUTH IN LENDING ACT (COUNT I) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINS T FIRST NATIONAL BANK (COUNTS II,IV, AND V) ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MILFORD CHRYSLER SALES INC.'S MOTION [#12] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST MILFORD CHRYSLER SALES INC. FOR NEGLIGENCE (COUNT IV) AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (COUNT V) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PARAGRAPHS 45 THROUGH 49 ARE STRICKEN FROM THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. MILFORD CHRYSLER SALES INC. SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER, BY 4/9/15. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/23/15. 3/23/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO UNREP. (fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
