VU v. WETZEL et al
| NGUYEN VU |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2014cv05691 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
| J. WILLIAM DITTER |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 6/15/16. 6/15/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILEDTO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, THE COMMONWEALTH'S RESPONSE, THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, AND PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS, IT IS ORDERED THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 5/10/16. 5/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
