MALLORY v. S & S PUBLISHERS et al
| CAROLE MALLORY |
| S & S PUBLISHERS, IVAN FISHER, ESQ., J MICHAEL LENNON, NORMAN MAILER (ESTATE) and NORRIS CHURCH (ESTATE) |
| 2:2014cv05702 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 93 - 94 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/9/17. 5/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 65 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS COMMERCIAL DISPARAGEMENT-INJURIOUS CONDUCT CLAIM AND PART OF PLAINTIFFS DEFA MATION CLAIM. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS DEFAMATION PER SE CLAIM, PLAINTIFFS FALSE LIGHT CLAIM, AND PART OF PLAINTIFFS DEFAMATION CLAIM. DEFENDANTS ARE ORDERED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS REMAINING CLAIMS WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/9/16. 3/10/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
