ASCELLAHEALTH, LLC v. CRx HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff: ASCELLAHEALTH, LLC
Defendant: CRx HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv05949
Filed: October 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM (DOC. NO. 22 ) IS DENIED. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL ANSWER THE COUNTERCLAIM WITHIN IN THE TIME PROVIDED BY THE F.R.C.P.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/9/2015. 4/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASCELLAHEALTH, LLC v. CRx HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASCELLAHEALTH, LLC
Represented By: MICHELLE S. WALKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRx HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?