EGLI v. STRIMEL et al
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER EGLI
Defendant: GEORGE STRIMEL, RADNOR STUDIO 21, RADNOR TOWNSHIP and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
Case Number: 2:2014cv06204
Filed: October 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 51 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/8/2016. 4/8/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO QUASH IS GRANTED IN PART AS DETAILED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL SHALL CONFER TO RESCHEDULE MR. WHITE'S DEPOSITION LIMITED TO RELEVANT AREAS OF INQUIRY. RADNOR TOWNSHIP'S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 11/20/15. 1/12/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
August 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER THAT RADNOR STUDIO 21 AND GEORGE STRIMEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS 4 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; VERIZON COMMUNICATION, INC.'S MOTION 5 IS GRANTED AND VERIZON IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION; RADNOR TOWNSHIP'S MOTION 7 I S GRANTED AND RADNOR IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION; DEFENDANTS RADNOR STUDIO 21 AND GEORGE STRIMEL ARE DIRECTED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, NO LATER THAN 20 DAYS FROM ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 8/28/15. 8/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EGLI v. STRIMEL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER EGLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE STRIMEL
Represented By: DANIEL STRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RADNOR STUDIO 21
Represented By: DANIEL STRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RADNOR TOWNSHIP
Represented By: MICHAEL P. LAFFEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
Represented By: MICHAEL F. EICHERT
Represented By: RIGEL FARR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?