ROGERS v. MAHALLY et al
| ERIC ROGERS |
| LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2014cv06498 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| L. FELIPE RESTREPO |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ADDENDUM AND CONSOLIDATE ARGUMENT AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF (D OC. NO. 27) IS DENIED AS MOOT. WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THIS ORDER THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL VACATE PETITIONER'S CONVICTION AND SHALL AFFORD PETITIONER A NEW SENTENCING HEARING ON HIS 10/28/91 CONVICTIONS FOR ONE COUNT OF POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE AND ONE COUNT OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/13/17. 2/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS ON 6/8/16. 6/10/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
