STANSBURY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District STANSBURY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANSBURY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Defendant:	COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:	KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Case Number:	2:2014cv06500
Filed:	November 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2015	Filing 24 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2241, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE WELL-REASONED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET, IT IS ORDERED THAT UPON DE NOVO REVIEW, TH E PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURELY FILED. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPE ALABILITY BECAUSE THE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. THE PETITIONER'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 5 11 ARE DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/21/15. 12/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2015

Filing 24 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2241, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE WELL-REASONED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET, IT IS ORDERED THAT UPON DE NOVO REVIEW, TH E PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURELY FILED. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPE ALABILITY BECAUSE THE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. THE PETITIONER'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 5 11 ARE DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/21/15. 12/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STANSBURY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?