BLACK v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
| MICHELE OWEN BLACK |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY, JOHN T. FALLON, LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP, GREGORY HENRY, BRYAN GARNER, CHARLES MCGARVEY, FRANK HAND and ROBERT POMPONIO |
| 2:2014cv06702 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| ANITA B. BRODY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER OF MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF NO. 102) that. TROOPER POMPONIO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMETN (ECF NO. 78) IS GRANTED;. THE LOWER MERION DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 76) AND THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND DETECTIVE JOHN T. FALLON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO... ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS:...SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 8/15/2018. 8/15/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF NO. 43) that. LOWER MERION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) IS GRANTED..... THE MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OF DEFENDANT STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO (ECF N O.33) IS GRANTED.. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERGY COUNTY AND DET. JOHN T. FALLON TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 35) IS GRANTED..... SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/21/2015. 9/21/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
