WILLIAMS et al v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
GARY WILLIAMS and NINA WILLIAMS |
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., U-HAULCO. OF CALIFORNIA, COLUSA QUICK SERVE MARKET, K&B TRANSPORTATION, INC. and GENERAL MOTORS, LLC |
K&B TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
COLUSA QUICK SERVE MARKET, U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and U-HAULCO. OF CALIFORNIA |
2:2014cv06727 |
November 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Montgomery |
PETRESE B. TUCKER |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 139 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT K & B TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/18/16. 11/18/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, ) |
Filing 44 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. THE COURT'S 1/14/15 ORDER IS VACATED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 2/25/15. 2/25/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,U-HAUL CO. OF CALIFORNIA AND COLUSA QUICK SERVE MARKET MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE A MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/14/15. 1/14/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.