HEMINGWAY et al v. MAUGER et al
| DARYL HEMINGWAY, DAVE HEMINGWAY, INTERNATIONAL REALTY SOLUTIONS, LLC and INTERNATIONAL REALTY SOLUTIONS, LLC SERIES 10 |
| LEE MAUGER, MAUGER & METER, ATTORNEYS AT LAW and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2014cv07036 |
| December 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| THOMAS N. ONEILL |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II OF PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS MATTER SHALL BE LISTED FOR TRIAL TO COMMENCE ON 4/3/17 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 4A. MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 3/13/17. PRETRIAL MEMORANDA SHALL BE FILED BY 3/20/17. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/30/17. 1/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I AND III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND THOSE COUNTS ARE DISMISSED. AS TO COUNT II OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT THE MOTION IS DENIED AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE CAN BE SCHEDULED FOR AN ARBITRATION HEARING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/15/16. 3/15/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
