SHOFFNER et al v. WENEROWICZ et al
| ROBERT SHOFFNER, ROBERT THORNTON, DANIEL MYERS and STEVEN STAUFFNER |
| MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, WENDY SHAYLOR and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2015cv00392 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GERALD J. PAPPERT |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/27/16. 4/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, ) Modified on 4/27/2016 (jaa, ).
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 5 ) IS GRANTED: PLAINTIFFS PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; PLAINTIFFS FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIM (COUNT I) IS DISMISSED; PLAINTIFFS EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM (COUNT II) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE JULY 27, 2015. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/13/15. 7/13/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
