PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: |
PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and JONATHAN MILLER |
Defendant: |
BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
Case Number: |
2:2015cv00405 |
Filed: |
January 28, 2015 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Philadelphia Office |
County: |
Montgomery |
Presiding Judge: |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Contract |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 31, 2023 |
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF NOS. 278 & 281) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/31/23. 8/31/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
July 26, 2023 |
Filing
272
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT BROADRIDGE'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL MOLDER 220 IS GRANTED. BROADRIDGE'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 231 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF J ONATHAN MILLER'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL 232 IS DENIED. PLAN MANAGEMENT'S MOTION TO AWARD POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST 227 IS DENIED AS MOOT. BROADRIDGE'S MOTION TO STAY THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT 246 IS DENIED AS MOOT. BROADRIDGE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY AND PLAN MANAGEMENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (ECF NOS. 259 AND 253) ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CIVIL JUDGMENT ENTERED ON 12/8/22 225 , IS VACATED AS TO DAMAGES ONLY. THE PARTIES SHAL L MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT INFORMING THE COURT AS TO HOW THE CASE SHOULD PROCEED ON OR BY 8/11/23. THE COURT WILL THEN COORDINATE WITH THE PARTIES TO SCHEDULE THE NEW TRIAL AS TO DAMAGES ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/26/23. 7/26/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
February 7, 2017 |
Filing
55
ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FULL & COMPLETE RESPONSES TO PLFFS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. DEFT'S OBJECTIONS TO THE INSTRUCTIONS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE RFA'S SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTION NUMBERS 7, 8, & 10 ARE SUSTAINED, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 2/7/17. 2/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
September 28, 2016 |
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY [#28] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 9/28/16. 9/28/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
July 7, 2015 |
Filing
16
ORDER THAT DEFTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: DEFT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT RELATES TO THE MARKETING AGREEMENT, & WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS III & IV IN THEIR ENTIRETY & DEFT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, ETC.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/6/15. 7/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?