SPEAR et al v. WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: BARBIE SPEAR and ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
Defendant: WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2015cv00582
Filed: February 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: RICHARD A. LLORET
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS BARBIE SPEAR AND ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN (PLAINTIFFS) SHALL RECOVER BY SUBPOENA, IF NECESSARY - AND PRODUCE ALL DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO DEFENDANT WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANYS MAY 4, 2015 FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFFS. IF SUBPOENAS ARE REQUIRED THEY SHALL ISSUE AT ONCE, AND SHALL BE RETURNABLE NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE PARTIES, BY COUNSEL, SHALL REPORT THE STATUS O F PRODUCTION BY A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE HELD WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. AT THE TIME OF THE STATUS CONFERENCE THE PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS WITH ME THE ENTRY OF A SCHEDULING ORDER IN THIS CASE. THE PLAINTIFFS SHALL PRO DUCE TO WESTFIELD THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO IN SPEAR, ET AL. V. FENKELL, ET AL., E.D. PA. 2:13-CV-02391-RAL WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, COMPLYING WITH ANY NOTICE OBLIGATIONS TO OTHER PARTIES TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEM ENT. THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER PREVIOUSLY ENTERED IN THIS CASE. THE PLAINTIFFS EXISTING OBJECTIONS TO WESTFIELDS FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFFS, BASED ON PRIVILEGE, ARE OVERRULED. THE PLAINTIFFS OTHER OBJECTIONS, GENERAL AND SPECIFIC, TO WESTFIELDS FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFFS ARE OVERRULED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/14/17. 11/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S 9 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED. THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY TO ARRANGE A RULE 16 CONFERENCE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 6/11/15. 6/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPEAR et al v. WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BARBIE SPEAR
Represented By: TIMOTHY P. LAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
Represented By: TIMOTHY P. LAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: CHARLES SCOTT RYBNY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?