GARNER v. NUTTER et al
| CURTIS GARNER |
| MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and MAJOR ABELLO |
| 2:2015cv01335 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| NORMA L. SHAPIRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' THIRD MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOCKET NO. 48) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THIS MATTER IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/17/17. 3/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PROSE PLAINTIFF, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMOVE THE ACTION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSE AND RETURN IT TO THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL STRIKE DOCUMENTS 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, AND 28. MR. GARNER IS GRANTED LEAVE UNTIL 3/14/16, TO FILE ONE AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFTS. SHALL NOT RESPOND TO ANY DOCUMENT FILED BY MR. GARNER UNTIL ORDERED TO DO SO BY THE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 2/12/16. 2/12/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
