PEREZ v. CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC. et al
| THOMAS E. PEREZ |
| CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES and JIMMY RENGEPES |
| 2:2015cv01502 |
| March 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AGAINST DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES IN THE AMOUNT OF $239,269.65 FOR BACK WAGES DUE TO THEIR VIOLATIONS OF THE FLSAS MINIMUM WAGE AND OVERTIME REQUIREMENTS, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207(A)(1), IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AGAINST DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $239,269.65 AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 216(B); AND DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDR Y INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES ARE ENJOINED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE FLSA, FROM: A. FAILING TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF MINIMUM WAGE UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 206(A); B. FAILING TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES THE APPROPRI ATE AMOUNT OF OVERTIME COMPENSATION AT ONE AND ONE HALF OF THEIR REGULAR RATES OF PAY FOR ALL OVERTIME HOURS WORKED IN EXCESS OF 40 HOURS PER WEEK UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 207(A); AND FAILING TO MAKE, KEEP, AND PRESERVE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE RECORDS O F THEIR EMPLOYEES AND OF THE WAGES, HOURS, AND OTHER CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT THAT THEY MAINTAIN UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 211(C) AND THE REGULATIONS ISSUED AND FOUND AT 29 C.F.R. PART 516. PLAINTIFF IS NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE SECURITY PURSUANT TO RULE 65(C) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/10/18. 4/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS 82 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED; THE COURTS JULY 26, 2017 RULING IS VACATED; WHI AZELES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO TESTIFY WITH CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/10/17. 8/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
