PEREZ v. CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC. et al

Plaintiff: THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant: CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES and JIMMY RENGEPES
Case Number: 2:2015cv01502
Filed: March 24, 2015
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: WENDY BEETLESTONE
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2018 111 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AGAINST DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES IN THE AMOUNT OF $239,269.65 FOR BACK WAGES DUE TO THEIR VIOLATIONS OF THE FLSAS MINIMUM WAGE AND OVERTIME REQUIREMENTS, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207(A)(1), IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AGAINST DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $239,269.65 AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 216(B); AND DEFENDANTS CENTRAL LAUNDR Y INC., GEORGE RENGEPES, AND JIMMY RENGEPES ARE ENJOINED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE FLSA, FROM: A. FAILING TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF MINIMUM WAGE UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 206(A); B. FAILING TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES THE APPROPRI ATE AMOUNT OF OVERTIME COMPENSATION AT ONE AND ONE HALF OF THEIR REGULAR RATES OF PAY FOR ALL OVERTIME HOURS WORKED IN EXCESS OF 40 HOURS PER WEEK UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 207(A); AND FAILING TO MAKE, KEEP, AND PRESERVE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE RECORDS O F THEIR EMPLOYEES AND OF THE WAGES, HOURS, AND OTHER CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT THAT THEY MAINTAIN UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 211(C) AND THE REGULATIONS ISSUED AND FOUND AT 29 C.F.R. PART 516. PLAINTIFF IS NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE SECURITY PURSUANT TO RULE 65(C) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/10/18. 4/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
August 10, 2017 86 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS 82 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED; THE COURTS JULY 26, 2017 RULING IS VACATED; WHI AZELES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO TESTIFY WITH CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/10/17. 8/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PEREZ v. CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS E. PEREZ
Represented By: M. DEL PILAR CASTILLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE RENGEPES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JIMMY RENGEPES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?