PAZ v. HUGHES et al

PAZ v. HUGHES et al

Plaintiff:	NICHOLAS PAZ
Defendant:	RENEE CARDWELL HUGHES and DENNIS T. KELLY
Case Number:	2:2015cv01846
Filed:	April 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	L. FELIPE RESTREPO
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 27, 2016	Filing 27 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 19) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S ENDS OF JUSTICE MOTION (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CLARIFY PLAINTIFF'S POSITION (DOCKET NO. 17) IS DEEMED MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS INSTRUCTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/25/16. 10/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )
May 18, 2015	Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF, NICHOLAS PAZ, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(b). THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF USP TUCSON. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 5/18/15. 5/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, WARDEN.(gs)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 27, 2016

Filing 27 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 19) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S ENDS OF JUSTICE MOTION (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CLARIFY PLAINTIFF'S POSITION (DOCKET NO. 17) IS DEEMED MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS INSTRUCTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/25/16. 10/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )

May 18, 2015

Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF, NICHOLAS PAZ, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(b). THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF USP TUCSON. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 5/18/15. 5/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, WARDEN.(gs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAZ v. HUGHES et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS PAZ
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RENEE CARDWELL HUGHES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DENNIS T. KELLY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?