DOE v. MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER et al
JANE DOE |
MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER and MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM |
2:2015cv02085 |
April 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
Civil Rights: Education |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, AND TO REINSTATE STATE LAW CLAIMS, IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/24/19. 8/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (FILED PURSUANT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION FILED ON 8/8/19)(kw, ) |
Filing 136 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-SUR-REPLY (ECF 125) IS DENIED; PLFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CORRECT HER DECLARATION (ECF 131) IS GRANTED, ETC. DEFT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF 87) IS DENIED; DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF 100) IS GRANTED. PLFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, & THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/17/19. 7/18/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 45 ORDER THAT COUNTS ONE THROUGH THREE OF THE COMPLAINT PERTAINING TO TITLE IX ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTRS FOUR THROUGH SIX OF THE COMPLAINT PERTAINING TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LAW ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/26/2016. 1/26/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.