ROSCOE v. WATCO COMPANIES, LLC et al
| DENNIS ROSCOE |
| WATCO COMPANIES, LLC, WATCO TRANSLOADING, LLC and BRIAN SPILLER |
| 2:2015cv02118 |
| April 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| C. DARNELL JONES |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER THAT REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED. THE MATTER IS HEREBY REOPENDED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RULING ON PLFF'S LETTER REQUEST REGARDING SETTLEMENT. PLFFS LETTER REQUEST REGARDING SETTLEMENT IS DENIED, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL AND ALL OTHER PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/20/19. 5/21/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE MATTER IS REOPENED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT (DOC. NO. 55 ) IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER REMAINS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/31/2018. 6/1/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 12/16/2016. 12/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
