WRIGHT v. WENEROWICZ et al
| ANTHONY WRIGHT |
| MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ____________ and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2015cv02161 |
| April 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| LINDA K. CARACAPPA |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AS TO GROUND ONE ARE SUSTAINED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED AS TO GROUND ONE. PETITIONER'S CONVICTION AND SENTENCE FOR BURGLARY ARE VACATED. RESPONDENT IS DIRECTED TO RELEASE PETITIONER FROM THE CUSTODY RESULTING FROM THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION ON THE BURGLARY COUNT. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS TO GROUNDS TWO THROUGH SIX IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITIO N FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AS TO GROUNDS TWO, THREE, AND SIX. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AS TO CLAIMS FOUR AND FIVE. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AS TO THE DSPOSITION OF GROUNDS TWO THROUGH SIX. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 7/11/16. 7/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
