CONNEARNEY v. MAIN LINE HOSPITALS, INC. et al
| CHRISTINA K. CONNEARNEY |
| MAIN LINE HOSPITALS, INC., KATHLEEN R. HOGAN, PHILLIP D. ROBINSON, MAGARET IACOBACCI, GREGORY W. PAPA and WILLIAM G. CLIFFORD |
| 2:2015cv02730 |
| May 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| GERALD J. PAPPERT |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/04/2016. 11/04/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kf, )
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#40] IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS II, III, IV, AND VII AND DENIED AS TO COUNT I, COUNT VI WITH RESPECT TO KATHLEEN HOGAN, AND COUNT X. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 10/28/16. 10/28/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [#4] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. COUNT II - INSOFAR AS IT ALLEGES A CIVIL CONSPIRACY - AND COUNTS III,IV,V,VII,IX AND XII OF CONNEARNEY'S COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUD ICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS X,XI,XV AND XVI IS DENIED. CONNEARNEY IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTS I, II - INSOFAR AS IT ALLEGES A DEPRIVATION OF HER CIVIL RIGHTS, VI,VIII,XIII,XIV AND XVII. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 12/22/15. 12/22/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
