SOWELL v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD et al
| LAMAR SOWELL |
| RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD and SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS CORPORATION |
| 2:2015cv03657 |
| June 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GERALD J. PAPPERT |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/7/17. 3/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS AWARDED $11,532.50 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES AND $2,739.41 IN COSTS AS THE PREVAILING PARTY. DEFENDANT SHALL PAY THE SUM OF $14,271.91 TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/4/16. 8/4/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR UNOPPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD. IS GRANTED.JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR BACK PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,614. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED A GAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,500. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/26/16. 5/26/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
