DAHL v. GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC et al
Plaintiff: OWEN DAHL
Defendant: GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC, GLADSTONE ASSOCIATES, LLC, DANIEL KREUTER, PAUL LALLY and DOES 1-5
Case Number: 2:2015cv04252
Filed: July 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. NO. 36] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT IV, WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF WASHINGTON PUBLIC POLICY, AND THE CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT VII, TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT; COUNT VIII, SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AND PETITION FOR JUDICIAL DISSOLUTION; AND COUNT IX, INJUNCTION FOR INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/26/17. 7/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAHL v. GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OWEN DAHL
Represented By: JOHN DUWORS
Represented By: SIDNEY L. GOLD
Represented By: VALERIE WEISMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC
Represented By: BRIAN J. BOYLE
Represented By: JOSEPH KERNEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLADSTONE ASSOCIATES, LLC
Represented By: BRIAN J. BOYLE
Represented By: JOSEPH KERNEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL KREUTER
Represented By: BRIAN J. BOYLE
Represented By: JOSEPH KERNEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL LALLY
Represented By: BRIAN J. BOYLE
Represented By: JOSEPH KERNEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?