PETERS v. COLVIN
TERESA PETERS |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
2:2015cv04750 |
August 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Chester |
JOSEPH F LEESON |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER OF 2/13/2019 THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES ECF NO. 17, IS GRANTED. THE COURT AUTHORIZES PAYMENT TO PATRICK J. BEST, ESQUIRE IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,360.50 IN ATTORNEY'S FEES. UPON RECEIPT OF THIS SUM, COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL REMIT $5,400.00 DIRECTLY TO PLAINTIFF, REPRESENTING THE SUM ALREADY PAID TO COUNSEL ON PLAINTIFF'S BEHALF PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 28 U.S.C. 2412. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., ON 2/13/2019. 2/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #17 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) filed by CAROLYN W. COLVIN. (LYNCH, ANDREW) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) filed by TERESA PETERS.Affidavit, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Attorney Affidavit, #3 Exhibit A - Fee Agreement, #4 Exhibit B - Attorney Resume, #5 Exhibit C - Time Records, #6 Exhibit D - Notice of Award, #7 Certificate of Service)(BEST, PATRICK) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF, TERESA PETERS, IS AWARDED ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EAJA IN THE AMOUNT OF FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/00 CENTS ($5,400.00), ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/27/2016. 9/27/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED, AND THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IS REVERSED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REMAND ONLY; AND THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/8/16. 9/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, ) |
Filing 14 ***(Court Only) Civ624 Notice to the Court regarding Report and Recommendation.(fdc) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. RE: IT IS RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW BE GRANTED AND THIS CASE BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE PARTIES MAY FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SEE LRCP 72.1. FAILURE TO FILE TIMELY OBJECTIONS MAY CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF ANY APPELLATE RIGHTS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 8/17/16. 8/17/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/17/2016: #1 R&R Ntc.) (fdc, ). |
Filing 12 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO TO HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY MICHAEL E. KUNZ, CLERK OF COURT ON 1/20/16. 1/21/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HON. THOMAS J. RUETER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 12/17/15. 12/17/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 10 REPLY Brief re #8 Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review filed by TERESA PETERS. Certificate of Service. (BEST, PATRICK) Modified on 12/15/2015 (lisad, ). |
Filing 9 Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff by CAROLYN W. COLVIN. (LYNCH, ANDREW) |
Filing 8 Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review filed by TERESA PETERS.Brief. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BEST, PATRICK) |
Social Security Administrative Record see paper number #6 . (jaa, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by CAROLYN W. COLVIN.(LITTMAN, M.) |
Filing 6 Administrative Record . (Attachments: #1 Appendix Court transcript index, #2 Appendix Documents related to administrative process including transcript of oral hearing, if applicable, #3 Appendix Payment documents and decisions, #4 Appendix Jurisdictional documents and notices, #5 Appendix Non disability related development, #6 Appendix Disability related development, #7 Appendix Medical Records Part 1, #8 Appendix Medical Records Part 2)(LITTMAN, M.) |
Filing 5 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc, ) |
Filing 4 Social Security Procedural Order. 8/28/2015 Entered and copies e-mailed. (aeg, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against CAROLYN W. COLVIN, filed by TERESA PETERS. IFP GRANTED. (fdc) |
Filing 2 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE COMPLAINT IS TO BE FILED AND SUMMONS IS TO BE ISSUED. THE U.S. MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA. SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT UPON THE DEFENDANT AT NO COST TO THE PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 8/27/15. 8/27/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fdc) Modified on 8/28/2015 (lisad, ). |
Summons Issued as to CAROLYN W. COLVIN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Two Summons forwarded to U.S. Marshal Service, One Summons forwarded to case opening clerk on 8/27/15. (fdc) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS BY TERESA PETERS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Complaint)(er, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.