BISHOP v. UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| JASON BISHOP |
| UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL T. DOCKERY, JR., LOUIS GARAY, JR., BRIAN GIEDER and KEVIN DONOHUE |
| 2:2015cv06069 |
| November 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Delaware |
| C. DARNELL JONES |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 78) IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, GARAY & DONOHUE ON ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THEM. IN ADDITION, THE COURT GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE FALSE ARREST & MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS AGAINST GIEDER. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 10/14/21. 10/15/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 48) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO: THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPT., UPPER DARBY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AND UPPER DARBY POLICE SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CHITWOOD. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 5/24/18. 5/24/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
