BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Petitioner:	OTIS BROWN, JR.
Respondent:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	2:2015mc00274
Filed:	December 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	Motion for Order
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 14, 2016	Filing 17 ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR A NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER ARE GRANTED. PETITIONER IS GRANTED EARLY UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE FROM HIS PROBATIONARY TERM, WHICH ENDED ON OR ABOUT 9/19/1974, NUNC PRO TUNC. PETITIONER 'S FEDERAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 641 ON OR ABOUT 3/14/1974, IS AUTOMATICALLY SET ASIDE, I.E. EXPUNGED. A CERTIFICATE SETTING ASIDE, I.E. EXPUNGING PETITIONER'S CONVICTION IS ISSUED NUNC PRO TUNC, PURSUANT TO 18 U .S.C. 5021(b) (1970) (REPEALED 1984). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL GOVERNMENT OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES CURRENTLY IN POSSESSION OF ANY RECORDS IN CONNECTION WITH PETITIONER'S ARREST, BOOKING, AND CONVICTION MUST PHYSICALLY REMOVE THOSE RECOR DS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AND THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/13/16. 7/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 14, 2016

Filing 17 ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR A NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER ARE GRANTED. PETITIONER IS GRANTED EARLY UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE FROM HIS PROBATIONARY TERM, WHICH ENDED ON OR ABOUT 9/19/1974, NUNC PRO TUNC. PETITIONER 'S FEDERAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 641 ON OR ABOUT 3/14/1974, IS AUTOMATICALLY SET ASIDE, I.E. EXPUNGED. A CERTIFICATE SETTING ASIDE, I.E. EXPUNGING PETITIONER'S CONVICTION IS ISSUED NUNC PRO TUNC, PURSUANT TO 18 U .S.C. 5021(b) (1970) (REPEALED 1984). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL GOVERNMENT OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES CURRENTLY IN POSSESSION OF ANY RECORDS IN CONNECTION WITH PETITIONER'S ARREST, BOOKING, AND CONVICTION MUST PHYSICALLY REMOVE THOSE RECOR DS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AND THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/13/16. 7/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: OTIS BROWN, JR.
Represented By:	ELIZABETH A. TARLOSKI
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	PETER F. SCHENCK(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?