CORLEY v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
| JOHN CORLEY |
| NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and STERLING CLAIM SERVICES, INC. |
| 2:2016cv00584 |
| February 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE FOREGOING MEMORANDUM, THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL, JAY LAWRENCE FULMER, IS SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS FOR HIS CONDUCT IN THIS COURT UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1927. DEFENDANTS MAY FILE A BILL OF COSTS AND ANY LEGAL MEMORANDA IN SUPPORT THEREOF WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/1/16. 8/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO STERLING IS GRANTED; THE MOTION TO STRIKE IS GRANTED; AND PURSUANT TO RULE 11(c)(3), PLAINTIFF AND/OR PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHAT INQUIRY PLAINTIF F AND/OR HIS ATTORNEY MADE IN DECIDING TO NAME STERLING AS A DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY IS ALSO ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1927. THE COURT WILL HAVE A HEARING AT WHICH PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST BE PRESENT, ON 5/16/2016, COURTROOM 3A AT 10:00 AM, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/18/16. 4/19/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
