DAILEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| DEBORAH DAILEY |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT, FRANCIS BIELLI, ROBERT DUBOW, SOZI TULANTE, ALAN BUTKOVITZ, MICHAEL DIBERARDINIS, ALBERT D'ATTILIO, RONALD STAGLIANO, BRIAN COUGHLIN, VERONICA PANKEY and CAROL STUKES-BAYLOR |
| 2:2016cv01331 |
| March 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MARK A. KEARNEY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 80 IS GRANTED UPON CONSENT IN PART AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 80 AS SUPPLEMENTED AFTER NOTICE WE MAY CONSIDER SUMMARY JUDGMENT 92 IS GRANTED AS TO TH E REMAINING DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 85 IS DENIED; AND, AS TODAY'S ORDER DISPOSES OF ALL CLAIMS, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/2/19. 10/3/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER - MEMORAUNDUM. ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 50 IS DENIED AS WE MUST CONTINUE TO ABSTAIN AND DEFER RULING UPON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AN ORDINANCE WHICH, TO DATE, REMAINS CHALLENGED AS TO ITS APPLICABILITY TO THE PLAINTIFF AND WE DO NOT HAVE GUIDANCE FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA COURTS AS YET. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/27/17. 10/27/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
