ZAHNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| EMMA ZAHNER |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TERENCE CLARK, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT SMITH and JAN LAMBERT |
| 2:2016cv02635 |
| May 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 10/12/17. 10/12/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER THAT DEFT JAN LAMPER'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, UNDER F.R.C.P. 12(c), OF COUNT FIVE OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 24), IS DENIED. THIS CASE WILL PROCEED ON COUNT FIVE ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/18/17. 1/18/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 12, 14) ARE GRANTED. COUNTS I, II, III, IV, & VI ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CASE WILL CONTINUE AS AGAINST DEFT LAMPER PURSUANT TO COUNT V, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/18/16. 8/18/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/30/16. 7/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
