MRO CORPORATION v. HUMANA, INC.

MRO CORPORATION v. HUMANA, INC.

Plaintiff:	MRO CORPORATION
Defendant:	HUMANA, INC.
Case Number:	2:2016cv02881
Filed:	June 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 5, 2019	Filing 86 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MRO'S MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT TO THE EXTENT THAT MRO HAS MOVED TO PRECLUDE HUMANA FROM ASSERTING ITS SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. MRO'S MOTION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT THAT MRO HAS MOVED TO PRECLUDE HUMANA FROM ASSERTING ITS FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. HUMANA'S MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 6/5/19. 6/6/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
August 23, 2017	Filing 45 ORDER THAT PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 29) IS DENIED. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT NO LATER THAN 9/1/2017. THE COURT WILL DEFER RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. NO. 34) PENDING THE PARTIES' JOINT REPORT. IT APPEARS THAT THE COURT'S PRIOR ORDERS ALLOWING THE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR BRIEFS UNDER SEAL NO LONGER SERVE ANY PURPOSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO UNSEAL THE PARTIES' FILINGS. COUNSEL MAY FILE OBJECTIONS EXPLAINING WHY THE PARTIES' BRIEFS SHOULD REMAIN UNDER SEAL NO LATER THAN 9/8/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/23/2017. 8/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 5, 2019

Filing 86 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MRO'S MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT TO THE EXTENT THAT MRO HAS MOVED TO PRECLUDE HUMANA FROM ASSERTING ITS SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. MRO'S MOTION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT THAT MRO HAS MOVED TO PRECLUDE HUMANA FROM ASSERTING ITS FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. HUMANA'S MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 6/5/19. 6/6/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

August 23, 2017

Filing 45 ORDER THAT PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 29) IS DENIED. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT NO LATER THAN 9/1/2017. THE COURT WILL DEFER RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. NO. 34) PENDING THE PARTIES' JOINT REPORT. IT APPEARS THAT THE COURT'S PRIOR ORDERS ALLOWING THE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR BRIEFS UNDER SEAL NO LONGER SERVE ANY PURPOSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO UNSEAL THE PARTIES' FILINGS. COUNSEL MAY FILE OBJECTIONS EXPLAINING WHY THE PARTIES' BRIEFS SHOULD REMAIN UNDER SEAL NO LATER THAN 9/8/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/23/2017. 8/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MRO CORPORATION v. HUMANA, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MRO CORPORATION
Represented By:	PETER R. BRYANT
Represented By:	GAVIN P. LENTZ
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: HUMANA, INC.
Represented By:	KATHRYN E. DEAL
Represented By:	JAMES JOHN WILLIAMSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?