GREEN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
RODNEY GREEN |
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MICHAEL OVERMYER, JOHN C. THOMAS and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
2:2016cv03630 |
June 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER THAT MARIROSA LAMAS, SUPERINTENDENT SCI CHESTER, SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR JOHN C. THOMAS, FORMER SUPERINTENDENT SCI CHESTER AS DEFENDANT. THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE AMENDED AS TO SUBSTITUTE MARIROSA LAMAS FOR JOHN C. THOMAS A S A DEFENDANT IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. AND CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND MARIROSA LAMAS' MOTION THAT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IS GRANTED. THE CAPTION OF THIS CASE IS AMENDED TO DELETE REFERENCE TO THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AS A DEFENDANT. THE PART OF THE MOTION THAT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST MARIROSA LAMAS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE SCHEDULED IN DUE COURSE. DISCVERY MAY PROCEED IN THE INTERIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/14/16. 12/15/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd,) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.