JOHNSON v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS INC
SCOTTLAND JOHNSON |
DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS INC |
2:2016cv03935 |
July 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 4) IS GRANTED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDM OPINION. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/28/16. 11/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JOHNSON v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SCOTTLAND JOHNSON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS INC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.