ARNOLD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
STEWART ARNOLD |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES A. RAMSEY, LEON MCKNIGHT, JOHN MOUZON, RODNEY ELEAZER, JIMMY GIST, EDWARD CAMPBELL, TOWMAN, VICTOR VALENZONA and CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT 01338 |
2:2016cv04103 |
July 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
PAUL S. DIAMOND |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 ORDER THAT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED as to ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS City of Philadelphia, Victor Valenzona, and Confidential Informant 013338, AND THEREFORE THOSE DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE; SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED as to COUNT IV (unlawful search and seizure); SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED as to COUNT VIII (assault and battery); SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE REMAINING CLAIMS (Counts V, VI, and VII) against DEFENDANTS CAMPBELL, ELEAZAR, MCKNIGHT, MOUZON, AND TOWMAN IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE CASE'S CAPTION TO INCLUDE ONLY DEFENDANTS CAMPBELL, ELEAZAR, MCKNIGHT, MOUZON, AND TOWMAN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 12/19/2017. 12/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Filing 61 ORDER THAT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OF DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICER JIMMY GIST IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT GIST ARE DISMISSED.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 5/31/2017. 6/1/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.