FISHER et al v. GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES
| CHARLES R. FISHER and DENNIS V. MARTIN |
| GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES |
| 2:2016cv04213 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Dauphin |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by CHARLES R. FISHER, DENNIS V. MARTIN (ROCCI, STEVEN) |
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #3 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF SHALL SERVE OR DISMISS THE COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 23, 2016. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 10/13/2016. 10/13/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mima, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order Extending Time to Serve the Complaint filed by CHARLES R. FISHER, DENNIS V. MARTIN..(ROCCI, STEVEN) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 7,275,768 B2. (tj, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 144689.), filed by CHARLES R. FISHER, DENNIS V. MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Ex A, #2 Ex B, #3 Civil Cover Sheets)(tj, ) |
| Summons 1 Issued as to GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES. Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/3/16 (tj, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHARLES R. FISHER, DENNIS V. MARTIN. (tj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
