ORENGO v. BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Plaintiff: JULIO ORENGO
Defendant: BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2016cv04635
Filed: August 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR JOINDER PURSUANT TO RULE 19 IS DENIED & THE MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD A CLAIM OF NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 12/28/16. 12/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ORENGO v. BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JULIO ORENGO
Represented By: MARC I. SIMON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?