BROWN v. C.E.C. et al
GARTOR KIKI BROWN |
C.E.C., G. BALDWIN, LIVERPOOL, RONALD PHILLIPS and ALISSA |
2:2016cv04640 |
August 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
LEGROME D. DAVIS |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDERED THAT, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS ECF 24 , PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE THERETO ECF 25 , AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO CHECK STATUS ECF 27 , THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS. AS TO PLAINTIFFS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAIM FOR FREEDOM FROM PUNISHMENT, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED. AS TO PLAINTIFFS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED. AS TO PLAINTIFFS § 1983 CONSPIRACY AND FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIMS, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO BURNS, LYNCH, AND MOORE, AND IT IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO BALDWIN AND LIVERPOOL. AS TO PLAINTIFFS MUNICIPAL LIABILITY CLAIM AGAINST CEC, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED. CHAMBERS SHALL SERVE THIS OR DER AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM BY FIRST CLASS MAIL UPON PLAINTIFF GARTOR KIKI BROWN, NA-6401, AT SCI-FOREST, P.O. BOX 307, MARIENVILLE, PA 16239, POSTED THIS SAME DATE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 7/21/20. 7/21/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER BY CHAMBERS AND E-MAILED.(jpd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.