GIDDINGS et al v. BROWN & BROWN GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
| ELBERT ANTHONY GIDDINGS, EUNICE ISAAC and PULLEN A. OSAGIE |
| BROWN & BROWN GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., JOEL BROWN, SR. and JOHN DOES |
| 2:2016cv04917 |
| September 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| LEGROME D. DAVIS |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES IS GRANTED IN PART. DEFENDANTS SHALL PAY $35,973.75 FOR PLAINTIFFS' REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS. THE COURT 3/23/20 ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS FOR $48,405 I S AMENDED TO INCLUDE THIS AWARD FOR ATTORNEY FEES, RESULTING IN A TOTAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $84,378.75; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 10/13/20. 10/13/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS BROWN & BROWN GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. AND JOEL BROWN IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $48,405.; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/23/20. 3/23/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
