PARK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
SEAN PARK |
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, AMID ISMAIL, LEONA SPERAZZA, STEPHEN BROWN, MEHRAN HOSSAINI ZADEH, MATTHEW PALERMO, JEFFREY GODEL and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
2:2016cv05025 |
September 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF DOC. NO. 50) IS GRANTED AS THE PLFF FAILS TO ADDUCE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT NECESSARY TO DEFEAT SUMMARY JUDGMENT WARRANTED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN FAVOR OF DEFTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 4/25/19. 4/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED. PLFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. I FURTHER ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 25) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 3/20/18. 3/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF #11) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/24/17. 1/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.