JOHNSON v. PERSON

JOHNSON v. PERSON

Plaintiff:	JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:	JOHN N. PERSON
Case Number:	2:2016cv05287
Filed:	October 6, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JOSEPH F. LEESON
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 20, 2018	Filing 43 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, ECF NO. 39, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, ECF NO. 40, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO BE FURNISHED WITH A DOCKETING STATEMENT AND A COPY OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CURE DEFECT IN PLEADINGS, ECF NO. 41, IS GRANTED, SUCH THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND TO PLAINTIFF: (A) A COPY OF THE DOCKET SHEET AND (B) A COPY OF HIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF NO. 40). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 6/19/18. 6/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, WITH COPY OF DOCKET AND COPY OF MOTION (ECF NO. 40), E-MAILED. (er, )
March 30, 2018	Filing 38 OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 13, IS GRANTED. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BUT JOHNSON'S ACCESS TO THE COURT CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO HIM FILING A NEW CIVIL ACTION IN THE EVE NT HIS MURDER CONVICTION IS INVALIDATED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, ECF NO. 34, IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/30/18. 3/30/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 20, 2018

Filing 43 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, ECF NO. 39, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, ECF NO. 40, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO BE FURNISHED WITH A DOCKETING STATEMENT AND A COPY OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CURE DEFECT IN PLEADINGS, ECF NO. 41, IS GRANTED, SUCH THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND TO PLAINTIFF: (A) A COPY OF THE DOCKET SHEET AND (B) A COPY OF HIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF NO. 40). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 6/19/18. 6/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, WITH COPY OF DOCKET AND COPY OF MOTION (ECF NO. 40), E-MAILED. (er, )

March 30, 2018

Filing 38 OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 13, IS GRANTED. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BUT JOHNSON'S ACCESS TO THE COURT CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO HIM FILING A NEW CIVIL ACTION IN THE EVE NT HIS MURDER CONVICTION IS INVALIDATED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, ECF NO. 34, IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/30/18. 3/30/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON v. PERSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMIEL JOHNSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN N. PERSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?