OLIVER v. SMITH et al
Petitioner: MONTRELL OLIVER
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, DIST. ATT. OF PHILA. CNTY., PA and ATT. GEN. OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2016cv05537
Filed: October 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONER'S CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE AND PRESENT TESTIM ONY FROM ALIBI WITNESS. EXECUTION OF THE WRIT IS STAYED FOR 180 DAYS TO PERMIT THE COMMONWEALTH TO RETRY PETITIONER. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE WRIT IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/9/24. 1/9/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 77) IS PRELIMINARILY NOT ADOPTED AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO JUDGE HEY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER REGARDING PETITIONERS INEFFECTIVENESS CLAIM FOR FAILURE TO CALL ALIBI WITNESSES. UPON COMPLETION OF THIS HEARING, JUDGE HEY SHALL SUBMIT AN AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/19/22. 5/20/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDERED THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; RESPONDENTS MOTION TO STAY CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION IS GRANTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS PLACED IN SUSPENSE PENDING PETITIONERS PCRA LITIGATION. RE SPONDNETS SHALL NOTIY THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY(30) DAYS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS SO THA HABEAS PETITION MAY PROCEED IN THIS COURT. PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS SHALL PROVIDE THE COURT WITH A STATUS REPORT AS TO THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS BY 2/16/18 SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 11/16/17. 11/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OLIVER v. SMITH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MONTRELL OLIVER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BARRY SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DIST. ATT. OF PHILA. CNTY., PA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATT. GEN. OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?