CHAN v. BARBOUR, INC.
Plaintiff: FRANCES CHAN
Defendant: BARBOUR, INC.
Case Number: 2:2016cv05688
Filed: October 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Delaware
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS AND TO STRIKE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS AND TO STRIKE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 7/26/17; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/12/17. 7/12/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHAN v. BARBOUR, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FRANCES CHAN
Represented By: KEVIN F. BERRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARBOUR, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?