REHMEYER v. PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION et al
JOANNE REHMEYER |
PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION, AUTOFORM, INC., MODEL PATTERN COMPANY, INC., PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION and SIDENER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. |
2:2016cv05690 |
October 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
York |
HARVEY BARTLE |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT MODEL PATTERN COMPANY, INC. ("MP") TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [#58] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO REQUESTS 37,47,48, AND 49, TO THE EXTENT RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN PRODUCED, LIMITED TO THE PERIOD FROM 11/7/04 TO 11/7/14, CONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/4/17. 10/5/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT PARKER-HANNIFAN CORPORATION'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 USC:1404(A) [#46] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 5/15/17. 5/15/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS. (fdc) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF JOANNE REHMEYER TO "REMAND TO STATE COURT" [#11] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/20/16. 12/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS. (fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.