STEIN et al v. CORTES et al
| JILL STEIN and RANDALL REITZ |
| PEDRO A. CORTES and JONATHAN MARKS |
| ALL OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ELECTORS OF PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP AND VICE-PRESIDENT-ELECT MICHAEL PENCE, PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP, VICE-PRESIDENT-ELECT MICHAEL PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, EDWIN D. SCHINDLER and PENNSYLVANIA SENATE MAJORITY CAUCUS |
| 2:2016cv06287 |
| December 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| PAUL S. DIAMOND |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM, IN MOVING TO ENFORCE THE AGREEMENT SETTLING HER 2016 LAWSUIT, FAILED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE JILL STEIN ASKS ME TO BAR THE USE OF ALMOST 4,000 VOTING MACHINES, THUS MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR PHILADELPHIA TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2020 PRESIDENT IAL ELECTION. THIS IS OF A PIECE WITH THE 2016 ACTION ITSELF: STEIN'S ELEVENTH-HOUR VOTING MACHINE "HACKING" ALLEGATIONS AND REQUEST FOR A RECOUNT THAT WOULD HAVE DISENFRANCHISED SOME SIX MILLION PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS IN BOTH INSTANCES, DR. STEIN PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED THAT SHE SEEKS TO PROMOTE ELECTION INTEGRITY. YET THE COMMONWEALTH SUGGESTS SHE SEEKS TO PROMOTE ONLY HERSELF. PENNSYLVANIA'S COMPUTER EXPERT TESTIFIED CREDIBLY IN 2016 THAT STEIN'S ALLEGATIONS "ARE APPROX IMATELY AS LIKELY AS THE FACT THAT ANDROIDS FROM OUTER SPACE ARE LIVING AMONGST US AND PASSING AS HUMANS (12/6/16 HR'G TR. 63:23-64:9.) HER ALLEGATIONS NOW THAT THE CHALLENGED VOTING MACHINES ARE UNRELIABLE AND THUS VIOLATE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEM ENT ARE AS BASELESS AND IRRATIONAL I WILL DENY HER MOTION......THE COMMONWEALTH AND CITY HAVE EXPANDED CONSIDERABLE RESOURCES TO DEMONSTRATE THAT DR. STEIN HAS BASED HER MOTION ON ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. THERE IS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE EVEN SUGGESTING THAT THE EAC AND PENNSYLVANIA HAVE CERTIFIED MACHINES THAT CAN BE "HACKED." YET DR. HALDERMAN'S DAFT THEORIES, PROMOTED BY DR. STEIN, WILL UNDOUBTEDLY SHAKE THE BELIEF OF SOME IN THEIR GOVERNMENT BECAUSE STEIN HAS CONVINCED THEM THAT VOTIN G INTEGRITY IS AT RISK IN PENNSYLVANIA. THAT IS CERTAINLY THE MOST UNFORTUNATE CONSEQUENCE OF STEIN'S POINTLESS MOTION. BECAUSE THERE IS NO BASIS IN FACT OR LAW TO ORDER THE RELIEF STEIN SEEKS, I WILL DENY HER MOTION. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/29/2020. 4/29/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOC. NOS. 4 & 5) IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 12/12/16. 12/12/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED & E-MAILED. MAILED TO PRO SE.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
