KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| SERGEI KOVALEV |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PAULA WEISS, YOLANDA KENNEDY and ANGELINEL BROWN |
| 2:2016cv06380 |
| December 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MARK A. KEARNEY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/5/21. 5/5/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF 120] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDMENT CLAIMS FOR RETALIATION BASED ON THE FALSE REPORTING OF DE FENDANTS WEISS AND KENNEDY ONLY AND THESE CLAIMS WILL PROCEED TO TRIAL; DEFNENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO ALL OTHER CLAIMS AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AND JUDGMENT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, MUST BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS; AND, DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND SHERIFF BROWN ARE DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/22/17. 9/22/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO KOVALEV. (fdc)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/28/17. 2/28/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO KOVALEV.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
